Table of Contents
Never ever had an engine issue. When the exhaust rusted off behind the cat it just seemed like a diesel.
I question how hard a swap it would be to obtain it into my '97 F150 that has an anemic 4.6 ... has a difficult time leaving it's own method ... the 300i6 would do everything I need this vehicle to do patgizz wrote: 3 things in the automotive world refuse to damage.
those ought to be held as the benchmark to which everything else is gauged. sadly, nearly everything else pales in comparison. And the Toyota 2f/3f (based on the chevy stovebolt 6 obviously) Wow, because of the outpour of praise, it looked good so I got it, here's the ad lmk what you people think Oops, really did not suggest to be cryptic, it slid my mind that the "5.0" was technically a 4.9 l.
Order of biz though, I'm relatively big, and the guiding wheel to seat is rather slim ... guy that wheel cover was not ribbed for my enjoyment:-LRB- The only trouble I've ever seen with vehicles like that, are broken shifters. Ford made them a little also difficult and they would snap right at the floorboard.
Maintain in mind the gas mileage won't be the ideal in the globe, however it will damn sure run forever. Never had an engine concern.
When the exhaust rusted off behind the cat it simply appeared like a diesel. I wonder just how hard a swap it would certainly be to obtain it into my '97 F150 that has an anemic 4.6 ... has a tough time getting out of it's own means ... The engine bay had not been created for anything longer than a Mod motor. One Canister remove an engine from a '97 style F-150 from the top, yet it draws.
WonkoTheSane created: spitfirebill composed: In respond to HappyAndy: Thanks Captain Obvious What did he say to warrant this? I'm genuinely interested. I really did not see anything in his reply that would need this feedback. "They are normally dependable as gravity so long as they aren't sludged up" What engine likes sludge? Knurled composed: wbjones composed: Brian created: I miss my 4.9 vehicle.
When the exhaust rusted off behind the cat it just seemed like a diesel. I ask yourself exactly how hard a swap it would certainly be to obtain it right into my '97 F150 that has an anemic 4.6 ...
Very very cramped engine bay lengthwise. yeah, had actually already figured that out ... it was a tongue in cheek blog post, that I really did not explain ... my negative In reply to spitfirebill: I included that point since when I had to discover a replacement 4.9 for my F150, I had to go with each in every junkyard in South Jacket to find one that had not been sludged up truly badly.
Bernie: Which is a much better van, while we're going to talk regarding a few concerns of these vans, but I I'm plainly not going to come out and say one is far better than the various other. Bernie: Well, they're basically the exact same automobile.
They seem to be a little bit a lot more utilized in that area, but, you recognize, those are several of the usages, but they're essentially the very same category of car. Mark: So, well, let's start with engines after that. What issues do you see in between these two vehicles? Bernie: Yeah. So allow's discuss engine and actually simply to specify that the design years, we're mosting likely to start from 2000 and up, you know, I indicate, these vans have actually been around for a very long time.
And, you understand, for a variation of a Chevy van has actually been around because, you understand, around that time too. We're not going to get back right into, into the earlier things. Since 2000, I mean, Ford's, you can obtain these with V6 engines or V8s. V8s are a lot more preferred and I wouldn't actually advise a V6 engine.
There's a lot of issues with these engines. In the earlier 2000 trigger plugs with impact to these engines, due to the fact that they really did not have enough threading in the trigger plug, which triggered issues.
Really extremely cramped engine bay lengthwise. yeah, had already figured that out ... it was a tongue in cheek blog post, that I didn't explain ... my negative In respond to spitfirebill: I included that point since when I needed to find a substitute 4.9 for my F150, I had to go via every one in every junkyard in South Jersey to locate one that wasn't sludged up truly terribly.
Bernie: Which is a better van, while we're going to discuss a few issues of these vans, but I I'm clearly not going to come out and state one is much better than the other. So if that's what you're searching for, you'll have to wait. Mark: So what are some of the differences in between these two brands? Bernie: Well, they're basically the very same vehicle.
Mark: So, well, let's begin with engines after that. Allow's talk about engine and really just to specify that the design years, we're going to start from 2000 and up, you understand, I indicate, these vans have actually been around for a long time.
And, you know, for a variation of a Chevy van has been around considering that, you understand, around that time too. We're not going to obtain back into, right into the earlier things. Since 2000, I mean, Ford's, you can obtain these with V6 engines or V8s. V8s are a lot more preferred and I would not actually recommend a V6 engine.
There's a whole lot of issues with these engines. In the earlier 2000 spark plugs with impact to these engines, due to the fact that they didn't have sufficient threading in the trigger plug, which triggered issues.
Navigation
Latest Posts
Is the Ford e150 the best truck?
Is the Ford F150 the ultimate truck?
Is the Ford e150 the best car?